Journal Rankings on History and Philosophy of Science
Essays in Philosophy | Pacific University
Ms. Tanya Mihaylova, Director of the Diplomatic Institute to the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Mr. Radoslav Yankulov, General Director of the Bulgarian National Radio, signed a Memorandum for cooperation between the two institutions. It foresees information exchange, informing the society and joint radio broadcasts about the training, research and public activities in the field of Bulgarian and international foreign policy. The Diplomatic Institute will provide information about its activities and its own and foreign lecturers, which will participate in the radio broadcasts on BNR. Radio journalists will be included as lecturers, geopolitical, geoeconomical and international relations experts, in the qualification courses of the Institute.
Philosophy: Philosophy Journal Ranking
The essays will be assessed by a special commission, which includes experts from the Diplomatic Institute, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Representation of the European Commission in Bulgaria. The two best of high-school students and the two best essays of university students will be awarded. The four winners will visit the European institutions in Brussels in June 2015. Their essays will be published on the website of the Diplomatic Institute, as well as in the online “Diplomacy Journal”, and the authors will receive certificates for their excellent performance. The final results will be announced on the Institute’s website in the period 11th - 15th May 2015.
A List of Cultural Studies Journals ..
An equally radical but opposite reaction is Deirdre McCloskey's, whodenies that there are any non-trivial methodological standards thateconomics must meet (1985, 1994). In her view, the only relevant andsignificant criteria for assessing the practices and products of adiscipline are those accepted by the practitioners. Apart from a fewgeneral standards such as honesty and a willingness to listen tocriticisms, the only justifiable criteria for any conversation arethose of the participants. Economists can thus dismiss arrogantpretensions of philosophers to judge economic discourse. Whatever agroup of respected economists takes to be good economics isautomatically good economics. Philosophical standards of empiricalsuccess are just so much hot air. Those who are interested inunderstanding the character of economics and in contributing to itsimprovement should eschew methodology and study instead the“rhetoric” of economics — that is, the means ofargument and persuasion that succeed among economists.