Often, they carried each other, the wounded or weak.
They might be physical, emotional or spiritual things.
He had love Martha more than his men, and as a consequence Lavender was now dead and this was something he would have to carry like a stone in his stomach for the rest of war."
Rat Kiley and Kurt Lemon
They goofed around.
O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. New York: Houghton, 1990.
Can bring all sorts of drama and headaches.
Helps us experience:
By Ivy Astry
Archetypes in The Things They Carried
Lieutenant Jimmy Cross was in love with a girl named Martha.
He thought about her often.
Was so head over hills in love with Martha he let her distract him and that causes him to lose a solider.
> The Things They Carried Essay
O'Brien's novel, The Things They Carried, demonstrates his attempts to make death less real through psychotherapeutic tactics like telling stories about the dead as if they were living and conceiving the dead as items instead of people.
free essay on The Things They Carried
Some stories only indirectly reflect the process of writing; other selections includeobvious metafictional devices. In certain sections of the book, entire chapters aredevoted to discussing form and technique. A good example is "Notes," whichelaborates on "Speaking of Courage, " the story that precedes it. The seriousreader of the real Tim O' Brien's fiction recognizes "Speaking of Courage" ashaving first been published in the Summer 1976 issue of Massachusetts Review.(3) Thisearlier version of the story plays off chapter 14 of Going After Cacciato, "UponAlmost Winning the Silver Star," in which the protagonist, Paul Berlin, is thinkingabout how he might have won the Silver Star for bravery in Vietnam had he had the courageto rescue Frenchie Tucker, a character shot while searching a tunnel. However, in TheThings They Carried's version of "Speaking of Courage," the protagonist is notPaul Berlin, but Norman Bowker, who wishes he had had the courage to save Kiowa, a soldierwho dies in a field of excrement during a mortar attack.(4) Such shifts in character andevents tempt the reader into textual participation, leading him to question the ambiguousnature of reality. Who really did not win the Silver Star for bravery? Paul Berlin, NormanBowker, or Tim O'Brien? Who actually needed saving? Frenchie Tucker or Kiowa? Whichversion of the story, if either, is accurate? The inclusion of a metafictional chapterpresenting the background behind the tale provides no definite answers or resolutions. Welearn that Norman Bowker, who eventually commits suicide, asks the narrator to compose thestory and that the author has revised the tale for inclusion in The Things They Carriedbecause a postwar story is more appropriate for the later book than for Going AfterCacciato. However, O'Brien's admission that much of the story is still invention compelsthe reader to wonder about the truth. The narrator assures us that the truth is that"Norman did not experience a failure of nerve that night . . . or lose the SilverStar for valor" (182). Can even this version be believed? Was there really a NormanBowker, or is he, too, only fictional?